Thursday, February 21, 2013

0910.5660 (Benjamin Schulz)

Reply to a comment of I. Schmelzer    [PDF]

Benjamin Schulz
This is a reply to the comment of Schmelzer on my earlier paper. In contrast to Schmelzer's claims, it is shown that passive locality does not correspond to the completeness condition of EPR. Nevertheless, it is argued that Schmelzer has found several errors in my article which, fortunately, can be corrected. In spite of Schmelzer's arguments, the Fritsche-Haugk theory can be used to define a local hidden variable theory for the singlet state.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5660

No comments:

Post a Comment