Thursday, September 13, 2012

1209.2698 (Adam Miranowicz et al.)

Analytical progress on symmetric geometric discord: Measurement-based
upper bounds
   [PDF]

Adam Miranowicz, Pawel Horodecki, Ravindra W. Chhajlany, Jan Tuziemski, Jan Sperling
Quantum correlations may be measured by means of the distance of the state to the subclass of states $\Omega$ having well defined classical properties. In particular, a geometric measure of asymmetric discord [Dakic et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 190502 (2010)] was recently defined as the Hilbert-Schmidt distance of a given two-qubit state to the closest classical-quantum (CQ) correlated state. We analyze a geometric measure of symmetric discord defined as the Hilbert-Schmidt distance of a given state to the closest classical-classical (CC) correlated state. The optimal member of $\Omega$ is just specially measured original state both for the CQ and CC discords. This implies that this measure is equal to quantum deficit of post-measurement purity. We discuss some general relations between the CC discords and explain why an analytical formula for the CC discord, contrary to the CQ discord, can hardly be found even for a general two-qubit state. Instead of such exact formula, we find simple analytical measurement-based upper bounds for the CC discord which, as we show, are very efficient in the case of two qubits and may serve as independent indicators of two-party quantum correlations. In particular, we propose an adaptive upper bound, which corresponds to the optimal states induced by single-party measurements: optimal measurement on one of the parties determines an optimal measurement on the other party. We discuss how to refine the adaptive upper bound by nonoptimal single-party measurements and by an iterative procedure which usually rapidly converges to the CC discord. We also raise the question of optimality of the symmetric measurements realising the CC discord on symmetric states, and give partial answer for the qubit case.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.2698

No comments:

Post a Comment