Wednesday, May 22, 2013

1305.4671 (Cyril Branciard)

Not all entangled states violate Leggett's crypto-nonlocality    [PDF]

Cyril Branciard
This note is a reply to M. Navascu\'es' claim that "all entangled states violate Leggett's crypto-nonlocality" [arXiv:1303.5124v2]. I argue that such a conclusion can only be reached if one introduces additional assumptions that further restrict Leggett's notion of "crypto-nonlocality". If a contrario one sticks only to Leggett's original axioms, there exist entangled states whose correlations are always compatible with Leggett's crypto-nonlocality---which is thus a genuinely different concept from quantum separability. I clarify in this note the relation between these two notions, together also with Bell's assumption of local causality.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.4671

No comments:

Post a Comment